Understand The Difference Between Fair Value Versus Historical Cost.
|
Difference Between Fair Value Versus Historical Cost |
|
Fair Value:
Fair value as the amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a liability settled between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.
Historical cost:
· is the amount (price) at which the asset or liability was originally obtained.
· Where the historical cost is expected to be different from the final value when the item is no longer on the balance sheet, some amortization or depreciation of the value may be called for. This can result in an amortized cost or depreciated cost value. These values are generally more reliably determinable, but less relevant than fair value. · Also read earlier article on historical cost concept.
|
|
|
Related Posts
- Explain the alternative bases of measurement used to measure the assets and liabilities in the balance sheet.
- WHAT IS FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING, ITS USEFULNESS AND LIMITATION
- Technical Summary Of IAS 40 Investment Property
- In Accounting, Explain What Is Recoverable Amount
- Is the net book value of fixed assets in the balance sheet represens or equal to its current “market value”?




Leave a comment