Late Or Improper Disclosure Of Unauthorised Currency Trading

In earlier accounting articles, we have discussed many accounting concepts/principles one of which is the FULL DISCLOSURE concept, however we should also know any delay/late or improper disclosure of information are also vital as the below case showed. Read the following case reported in the Reuter :23/10/2008:


Citic Pacific Under Probe Over Losses


HONG KONG: Hong Kong’s securities watchdog has launched a formal investigation into steel-to-property conglomerate CITIC Pacific after politicians and market-watchers blasted it for its belated disclosure of potentially US$2bil in losses from unauthorised currency trading.

A Hong Kong stock exchange spokesman, meanwhile, told Reuters yesterday the exchange had received 10 inquiries and complaints relating to Beijing-backed CITIC Pacific and would follow up the case on whether the company had disclosed information properly.

CITIC Pacific stated in a circular dated Sept 16, or nine days after the company discovered the unapproved trading, that it was not aware of any material adverse change in financial or trading position of the group since end 2007.

“It appears that the circular contained a false and misleading statement,” David Webb, a shareholder activist, said on his website.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) confirmed yesterday that a formal investigation had been launched into the affairs of CITIC Pacific. It gave no further information.

Investors dumped shares in CITIC Pacific, which was down by two-thirds in the two days through yesterday.

The company warned after the close of trading on Monday of realised and unrealised losses from leveraged foreign exchange contracts of HK$15.5bil (US$1.9biln) or nearly a third more than its net profit in 2007.

The stock closed down 25% yesterday at HK$4.91, the lowest since January 1991. It underperformed the blue chip Hang Seng Index, which ended down 5.2% yesterday.

CITIC Pacific, which owns 17.5% of dominant Hong Kong airline Cathay Pacific Airways, is headed by tycoon Larry Yung, who once topped the Forbes magazine list as mainland China’s richest person.

The unexpected losses triggered a raft of analyst and credit agency downgrades. One analyst blamed the company’s “cowboy” hedging policy and another said it would take a long time for its reputation to recover.

CITIC Pacific’ Beijing-owned parent, CITIC Group, had agreed to arrange a US$1.5bil standby loan facility to the company and CITIC Pacific also planned to sell its stake in trading firm Da Chong Hong Holdings for cash.

Da Chong Hong is worth US$297mil, and CITIC Pacific owns about 57% of it.

The news also led to concerns over potential losses at other Chinese companies.

Shenzhen-listed Shenzhen Nanshan Power warned yesterday that company officials had signed oil derivatives contracts without the firm’s approval.

Analysts said the contracts are still in the money but warn that risks increase as international oil prices fall



The above case showed the impact of such non or improper or delay/late or inadequate disclosure will ruin the reputation of the company and erode shareholder wealth. It will definitely indicate a lack of proper internal check and internal controls which therefore needs to be tightened. Well it would be interesting to imagine that you are the CEO of that company and see how you would run and react to such malpractises.




Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.